Proje Güncellemeleri

Perhaps it was once too dazzling, how can the current ending of Believe not be lamentable? In mid-May this year, Believe single-handedly initiated the narrative uptrend of the ICM Launchpad, with the daily trading volume of the ecological token reaching 600-800 million USD, giving people a glimpse of new hope for Memes. Unfortunately, it was short-lived, and after a long wait of six months, Flywheel came up with a new issuance and produced an abstract video.. Now, abandoned by many, some leading projects have chosen to exit and remain independent due to a loss of trust, such as PMX Trade and Dupe. I wonder if Ben Pasternak still remembers his initial dream. Believe in what??? Just as the Believe group was experiencing a wave of exits, Pump Fun launched Spotlight to support ICM...

Those who haven't joined the group yet, join the group 👀 The teacher buried his head in coding for 1 month. @Polymarket The peak period is coming soon, and we are starting to share some valuable content. 👉 Prediction Market Resource Sharing The "top-tier" prediction market projects on the market have deep integration. PMX (Polycule) \ Opinion \ Polymarket \ TradeFox \ ForeGate \ Predictify team members are all in the group.

$pmx & $viva oversold by a lot. Perfect opportunity to buy more, so bought more and not looking back until December when markets are a lot better on chain. Wether you got $5, $500, $5000, throw some in, see your life change by buying these dips.

Vitalik Buterin's Old Manuscript Treasure: The Unfinished Journey of the Encryption World Have you ever looked back at your Moments from a few years ago? Those motivational quotes and jokes that you casually posted suddenly seem quite insightful. Vitalik Buterin's old articles give off a bit of that vibe—written casually, but today they seem like a prophecy for the encryption industry. I recently flipped through his 2014 article and felt like I had opened a "encryption bible": predicting markets, DAOs, stablecoins, privacy technologies... these concepts have now become the infrastructure of the industry, but when he wrote it, many people probably still didn't understand what Bitcoin was. What's more interesting is that these articles contained quite a few ideas that have not yet exploded, like unlit gunpowder. Today, let's talk about a few of them and see which ones have already blown up and which ones are still waiting for the wind to come. Vitalik Buterin's way of thinking is really impressive. He can pick details from mathematical formulas and also write articles that ordinary people can understand. For example, in 2014, he wrote "Exploring Stablecoins," which directly pointed out the two core designs of stablecoins: algorithmic stablecoins and asset-collateralized stablecoins. Who would have thought that this thing would become the cornerstone of DeFi years later? USDT, DAI, USDC, which one did not grow out of this idea? For example, "DAOs Are Not Corporations". He has long said that DAOs should not be hierarchical like traditional companies, but should rely more on community collaboration. Today's DAOs are indeed moving in this direction, but there is still a bit of a "rule by man" flavor, and they are still somewhat short of complete self-governance. There are also "Social Recovery Wallets." When I first read this article, I was a bit confused about what "social recovery" meant. Later, I discovered that this is Vitalik Buterin's early exploration of account abstraction. Current smart wallets, like Safe (formerly known as Gnosis Safe), use similar logic. Lost your private key? No problem, just ask a few friends to help you recover it. This design not only enhances security but also makes it easier for ordinary users to accept. Of course, there are also some concepts that are still on the way, such as "Quadratic Funding" that he mentioned in 2018. This thing sounds cool; simply put, it is a fairer way of distributing public funds, where the more donors there are, the more funding the project receives. Gitcoin is already using this model, but it is still somewhat distant from the mainstream. Then there is "Harberger Taxes", a new ownership model that sounds like an economist's carnival, but it is too far from ordinary users and hasn't gained traction yet. Speaking of ideas that haven't fully exploded yet, the recent Believe project seems interesting to me. It is a protocol specifically designed for the "faith economy," with the core logic being to connect creators and supporters directly. Simply put, anyone can initiate their own project, find willing "believers" to support them, and then obtain funding through Believe's tools. Its first batch of applications, such as PMX, Dupe, Inbox, and Virus, have already found product-market fit, and even competitors have started to imitate its methods. But what’s even more exciting is its next step—integrating Vitalik Buterin's unfinished ideas, such as prediction market governance and public fund allocation, into the creator economy. Imagine this: a DAO starts with Believe's tools, funding is allocated through Quadratic Funding, and governance uses prediction markets to optimize decision-making. Isn't this the theory of Vitalik Buterin becoming reality? What other ideas in Vitalik Buterin's old writings are worth exploring? For example, can a fully autonomous DAO really be realized? Or is there a chance for a strange economic model like Harberger Taxes to become popular? What do you think? Vitalik Buterin's unfinished journey, what will be the next breakout point?

Current position to date: Memes; $bucky, $xavier, $lolcoin, $neet - all of them are long term. Meme pa's right now are weird, not really moving much but macro perspectively, quite bullish on all 4 of them. Utils; $karma, $voidify, $pmx, $zera, $viva, $qstay - too bullish. All of them are long term, give it a few weeks and we will start to see 10x on the prices on some of these. Enjoy. Little update for the new week so you have a watchlist to start buying some of these.